Methodology

How we research and write

An honest account of how Wyse coverage is produced — what the process involves, where AI fits in, and what we consider our responsibility to get right.

The short version

AI tools assist in researching and drafting Wyse content. Primary sources — official pricing pages, product documentation, privacy policies, company filings — are the basis for all factual claims. Editorial judgment about what to cover, how to frame an assessment, and what conclusion to draw is applied on top of that research, not replaced by it.

We do not consider AI assistance a shortcut. We consider it a way to move through large volumes of structured information more thoroughly than would otherwise be practical for a small operation covering a fast-moving category.

Sources

Every factual claim on a Wyse tool page or in a review is sourced from one of the following:

  • Official pricing pages. Pricing tiers, plan names, and billing cadences come directly from the tool's own website. We do not use third-party pricing aggregators as primary sources.
  • Product documentation and help centres. Feature availability, context window sizes, model names, and platform support are sourced from official documentation.
  • Privacy policies and data processing agreements. Privacy and compliance notes are sourced from the tool's stated policies, not from marketing copy.
  • Company filings and official announcements. Founding dates, funding rounds, and leadership details are sourced from official press releases, regulatory filings, or the company's own about pages.

Where a claim cannot be verified against an official source, we either omit it or flag it explicitly as unverified.

What AI does in our process

AI tools are used to:

  • Search for and retrieve information from primary sources
  • Synthesise large volumes of documentation into structured drafts
  • Cross-check claims across multiple source documents
  • Draft prose that is then reviewed and edited

AI tools are not used to:

  • Make coverage decisions — what gets reviewed and what does not
  • Form verdicts — whether a tool is worth using, and for whom
  • Fabricate sources or fill gaps where official information is unavailable
  • Publish without a verification pass against the sources the content is based on

Verification

Each piece of content carries a last-updated date. That date reflects when the content was last checked against official sources — not just when it was written. When pricing changes, a feature ships, or a verdict no longer holds, we update the piece and log the change in our public changelog rather than silently rewriting it.

We aim to review high-priority tool pages — those covering the most widely used tools, or tools that ship changes frequently — at least every 60 days. Lower-priority pages are reviewed on a longer cycle.

Verification is not a guarantee of accuracy at the moment you read a piece. AI tools change quickly. A price that was accurate when we checked may have changed since. The last-updated date tells you when we last looked; it does not tell you nothing has changed since.

Editorial standards

A Wyse review is expected to take a position. "It depends" is not a verdict. The goal is to give a reader who already knows they need this type of tool a clear answer on whether this specific tool is the right one for them, and under what conditions that answer might change.

Reviews name tradeoffs explicitly. A tool's weaknesses receive the same attention as its strengths. Affiliate relationships — where they exist — do not soften a negative assessment. The affiliate disclosure policy is described on our About page.

What we do not cover

Wyse covers tools that are publicly available, have documented pricing, and have enough of a track record to assess meaningfully. We do not review tools that are invitation-only, have no public pricing, or that we cannot verify basic facts about. We do not accept tools for review — coverage decisions are made editorially based on reader relevance.